Very useful. One thing I’d be careful with is fallback semantics. For non-consequential tasks, falling back from Jev to an LLM makes sense.

Very useful. One thing I’d be careful with is fallback semantics. For non-consequential tasks, falling back from Jev to an LLM makes sense. But once the decision can trigger a real-world effect, a failed/unavailable Jev path should not silently become “let the LLM decide”. I’d separate: Jev unavailable → LLM fallback for advisory/generative work Jev unavailable → escalate/fail closed for consequential decisions That boundary becomes pretty important as this pattern moves from coding agents into operational systems.